[argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0
- From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:28:23 +1100
qcore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
The gamut mapping appeared to me to be working in that the separations
themselves were as I expect (and love) from using Argyll -- smooth,
detailed, minimised clipping etc -- but mapping to an oddly restricted
version of the ISO Coated v2 gamut.
I need a specific example to track this down, as I haven't seen
anything like this in my testing.
Graeme Gill.
Other related posts:
