[argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0

  • From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:28:23 +1100

qcore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
The gamut mapping appeared to me to be working in that the separations themselves were as I expect (and love) from using Argyll -- smooth, detailed, minimised clipping etc -- but mapping to an oddly restricted version of the ISO Coated v2 gamut.

I need a specific example to track this down, as I haven't seen
anything like this in my testing.

Graeme Gill.

Other related posts: