[argyllcms] Re: Fwd: Question about M1 measurements

  • From: Giacomo Catenazzi <catecate@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:40:23 +0200

Note: color adaption will do the rest for magazines (also thanks the many
white pages).


On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Roger Breton <graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I love these discussions, Graeme und Gerard :-)
>
> / Roger
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Graeme Gill
> Sent: 26 ao├╗t 2014 19:44
> To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [argyllcms] Re: Fwd: Question about M1 measurements
>
> Roger Breton wrote:
> > Isn't the "target" illuminant always D50 in an ICC profile?
>
> For interoperable ICC profiles, yes. But note that traditionally the "D50"
> that most instruments produce is M0 based, not M1, so mixing M0 and M1
> based D50 PCS profiles will have problems.
>
> For the business of getting better visual matches in the face of FWA/OBE,
> then it's desirable to create non-standard ICC profiles for the actual
> viewing illuminant, rather than D50.
>
> Graeme Gill.
>
>
>
>

Other related posts: