[argyllcms] Re: Fwd: Question about M1 measurements

  • From: Roger Breton <graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 09:15:54 -0400

So corrections are "illuminant-dependent" then?

/ Roger

-----Original Message-----
From: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Graeme Gill
Sent: 26 août 2014 09:08
To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [argyllcms] Re: Fwd: Question about M1 measurements

Roger Breton wrote:

> I have not looked at your code but do you use a "fixed" correction or a 
> "dynamic"
> correction in argyll FWA compensation?

Sorry Roger, it's hard to answer such a question. Every reading is different, 
so by definition nothing is fixed.

If you're imagining something like a static shift in b*, then no - far from it.
It's a spectral correction model of the way the light interacts with the media, 
including the FWA response.

Graeme Gill.




Other related posts: