[argyllcms] Re: Firefox qcms vs. lcms vs. Argyll imdi

  • From: Niccolò Belli <darkbasic4@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:58:54 +0100

Il 11/11/2010 07:36, Graeme Gill ha scritto:
> qcms refused to work ! So not only does it not support ICC V4 profiles
> as lcms does,
> it can't actually handle a normal range of ICC V2 RGB profiles (in fact
> it crashed,
> which may mean that there is a bug in rejecting profiles it doesn't like.)

You are too optimist Graeme :) qcms rejects almost anything, even a
matrix+shaper v2 profile if it's too complex :|
Anyway I'm really impressed from the argyll results, didn't think it was
to fast. Qcms's suckness does not impress me anymore, almost everyone
knows it sucks hard.

Darkbasic

Other related posts: