[argyllcms] Re: Firefox qcms vs. lcms vs. Argyll imdi

  • From: Niccolò Belli <darkbasic4@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:58:54 +0100

Il 11/11/2010 07:36, Graeme Gill ha scritto:
> qcms refused to work ! So not only does it not support ICC V4 profiles
> as lcms does,
> it can't actually handle a normal range of ICC V2 RGB profiles (in fact
> it crashed,
> which may mean that there is a bug in rejecting profiles it doesn't like.)

You are too optimist Graeme :) qcms rejects almost anything, even a
matrix+shaper v2 profile if it's too complex :|
Anyway I'm really impressed from the argyll results, didn't think it was
to fast. Qcms's suckness does not impress me anymore, almost everyone
knows it sucks hard.


Other related posts: