[argyllcms] Re: "Failed to meet target 0.4, got worst case 0.3" WTF?

  • From: Niccolò Belli <darkbasic4@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 01:32:39 +0100

Il 12/11/2010 01:23, Graeme Gill ha scritto:
> I've explained this once before: Each iteration tries to meet the
> target threshold. If it fails, it reverts to the previous best.
> The previous best was better than what was achieved at this iteration.
> (ie. the display and/or instrument aren't perfectly repeatable).

What's even more strange is that it doesn't have any difficult to reach
target without -V -Ibw. Screen is a laptop one, a very bad quality one I
think. Maybe omit them is a better choice.


Other related posts: