[argyllcms] Re: FWA compensation.

  • From: "Amin Gharehchaie" <amin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:54:32 +0100

Thank you for the answer.

I have the SpectroscanT but it is the 8mm apture modell and as much as I have understood it is not possible to change filter on that modell.

But what I could do is then to get an UV-Cut Eyeone and then compare the reading of the Eyeone and the UV-Cut modell?

Best regards

----- Original Message ----- From: "Graeme Gill" <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 11:47 PM
Subject: [argyllcms] Re: FWA compensation.

Amin Gharehchaie wrote:
The spectra curve on this paper looks pretty straight without any bumps in the spectra curve.

So I guess the paper is without any optical brighteners.

The technical way to confirm this is to compare the white
spectrum with and without UV. Some instruments allow this,
such as the Spectrolino and XRite DTP70 (where you can put
the filter on and off), and the i1iSis can take
readings with and without UV illumination.

So I should make the profile without -f

Probably safer to, if you are sure that the paper doesn't
have any whiteners.

Graeme Gill.

Other related posts: