[argyllcms] Re: FW: Re: Question regarding gamut mapping for photographic images

  • From: "Greg Sullivan" <greg.sullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 06:56:35 +1000

Gerhard wrote:
> There is also no requirement at all that the saturation intent gamut 
> mapping must fully utilize the extemes of the destination gamut.

Yes, I understand. I was actually very surprised to learn that Argyll did
actually do it this way. (and I'm very glad it does it this way because I
think that post from Tom Lianza makes a lot of sense, and I want to
experiment with the technique).


Other related posts: