[argyllcms] Re: FW: Re: Question regarding gamut mapping for photographic images

  • From: "Greg Sullivan" <greg.sullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:28:28 +1000

Why is it that in Argyll, that the "Enhanced Saturation" intent is referred
to also as "ICC Saturation", when the ICC specification (V4.2) says:

"6.2.5 Saturation intent
The exact gamut mapping of the saturation intent is vendor specific and
involves compromises such as trading
off preservation of hue in order to preserve the vividness of pure colours."

I.e, how can Argyll refer to this as being "ICC", when this intent is so
poorly defined? 


Other related posts: