[argyllcms] Re: FW: Re: Question regarding gamut mapping for photographic images
- From: "Greg Sullivan" <greg.sullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:49:14 +1000
Oh. ;)
Greg. (who doesn't deserve to be an Argyll user ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Graeme Gill
Sent: Tuesday, 18 October 2005 16:15
To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [argyllcms] Re: FW: Re: Question regarding gamut mapping for
photographic images
Greg Sullivan wrote:
> I've just been reading some of the earlier messages about this gamut
mapping
> issue. In the message below, I really do not get the impression that
Argyll
> maps the source gamut to the extremeties of the destination gamut.
> The main reason for my doubt is the mention of applying a "modest
saturation
> enhancement". To me this doesn't mean the same thing as mapping the
> extremeties. :)
The "modest saturation enhancement" refers to increasing saturation beyond
what is achieved by mapping the source gamut to match the destination,
ie. "enhanced" rather than just "maintain" the relative saturation of
colors within a gamut.
Graeme Gill.
Other related posts:
