I have been confused about whether or not Eye of Gnome, under Linux, supports color management. There seemed to be several bits of seemingly contradictory evidence. 1. eog definitely shows something different on the display from what gimp, inkscape, and Firefox, all of which agree, show. The last three programs can be configured to get the display profile from from the system, and they show exactly the same thing for any image file. If I tell those programs not to use the display profile, then what they show looks exactly like what eog shows. 2. Searching the source code for eog does bring up icc strings. I believe it may also show it making an attempt to get the profile from the system, but I'm not sure about that. I didn't try to actually understand the code, looking instead just at function calls which seemed relevant. 3. At the suggestion of a couple of previous responses to my posts, I tried looking at certain test files as recommended, and the results seemed to confirm that eog was using color management information. 1 seems inconsistent with 2 and 3. But I believe I may have discovered one possible source. Searching the eog development archives, I found notes to the effect that color management only worked for files with imbedded color profiles. (This is considered a defect.) I don't know if that means it uses only the imbedded profile or if it means that it will only make use of the system display profile if there is a profile of any sort imbedded in the file, e.g, an sRGB profile. It may be that the image files I've been testing with don't have imbedded profiles. Any comments? -- Leonard Evens <len@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Mathematics Department, Northwestern University