Graeme Gill, 2009-05-27 22:17:36 +1000 : > Roland Mas wrote: >> Do you think the API/ABI will change before 2.10 final? > > I think that's unlikely in the short term, although changes due to > changing Argyll requirements will inevitably happen in the future. I'm > mainly concerned about whether I've broken it, or whether I've left > any integer overflow or buffer overrun holes in it. I don't know about that, but it seems Argyll needs to be adapted: the "spaces" function has gained an extra parameter, and the calls to this function from (at least) xicc/xmono.c, xicc/xmatrix.c, xicc/xicc.c and xicc/xlut.c can't be compiled because of that. Would it be fine to use NULL there? Roland. -- Roland Mas $ chown -R us:us your_base*