[argyllcms] Re: "Enhance"

  • From: Ben Goren <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 11:24:35 -0700

On Dec 4, 2015, at 11:11 AM, Nick Dunmur <nickdunmur@xxxxxx> wrote:


On 4 Dec 2015, at 17:50, Ben Goren wrote:

…but some of these are also being used for email and MyFaceTwit and that
sort of thing, and the response from the artist is, “The pictures look
washed out on the screen.”

Forgive me if this is too obvious, but it's not simply a matter of a profile
conversion to suit the display (ie., sRGB)…?

Worth checking, but, no, that’s not it. It’s a completely color-managed
workflow start to finish. The final sRGB-tagged image is a perfect visual match
for the initial out-of-camera image tagged with the camera’s scene-specific
profile.

Rather, it’s a matter of watercolors having a much more limited tonal range
than displays. The blackest black you can get from a watercolor is nowhere near
as black as the blackest black you can get from a quality inkjet print…and
displays have a much greater dynamic range than prints. Were the artist
starting from scratch working on the display, she’d use the full dynamic range
of the display; she wants to see her watercolors magically transformed into
what she would have done in the digital medium.

b&

Other related posts: