Dear Preben and other owners of "old" colorimeters, I contacted Graeme off-list and was looking if I can send him an old Chroma 4. I did not found a working USB version so that's not possible. But I must admit that I'm not that sorry here. And thinking more about that I think it's good _not_ to support the Chroma 4, Spyder 1 or similar old devices at all ;-) I strongly advice _not_ to use such an old colorimeter today: 1) They are suited only for CRT 2) The filters age and it's more then likely that the readings the instrument will give will be _far_ off. So when you calibrate/profile your display the profile will be meaningless. But even worse: you might think your display would be calibrated while it is far off! So working without colormangement and knowing that the colors will be arbitrary might be a better option then using such an old aged device and _thinking_ you would work with accurate colors! I surely understand when someone does not want or simply can't spend too much money for things like that, but buying a new colorimeter is not expensive any longer. So please do yourself a favour and don't fiddle with such an old instrument which once _was_ a measuring device for color. I personally would look for an X-Rite DTP94. You still can buy new devices from some OEMs (Eizo, Quatographic and some others). I'm biased here, but you can contact me off-list and I can help you to find a source for a DTP94. But any new device will be a big improvement over an aged device like the Sequel Chroma and Gamma colorimeters. I personally would even be sceptical when using an EyeOne Display version 1, because they already could be "off". Please note that I do _not_ say that all EyeOne Display 1 are not usable any longer! If you want to measure reflective colors a new i1 Pro (Revision D, don't buy a used one with Revision A or B) will be more expensive, but you can buy the package "Eye One Photo LT", which is not that expensive and then you can use the free X-Rite program ColorPort to create and measure targets and use Argyll for profile creation. That's a good option IMO. Best regards Peter