On 2010 Feb 2, at 6:37 PM, Klaus Karcher wrote: > Graeme's method to estimate FWA amount is very elegant IMHO: he > uses the curve shape as measure (UV absorption and blue > remission of the FWAs cause a typical curve shape) -- but of > course you need spectral data and it's still a estimation > (albeit a much better estimation than tristimulus values). Since I wrote that last email I rememberd that the printer came with a swatch book of Canon papers. So, I've just spent a bunch of time running through the book with my i1, and I now know *exactly* what to look for. Papers with FWA have a very distinctive shoulder on the left side of the plot. For example, here's Canon's Fine Art Natural:
And their Fine Art Bright White:
I had started to get excited over the Hahnemuhle Photo Rag sample in the book, which measures at D50 Lab: 97.008566 0.533525 0.264654. But, as you can see, it does actually have a bit of FWA (though not a whole lot, to be sure):
So, I'm now going back through the book, this time with spotread -S, looking for the best paper without any FWA.... Cheers, b&