What's your definition of 'good'? I had a considerable amount of nonuniformity in white balance & luminosity across the screen (up to 20%), so I had to swap out a # of times until I got a decent monitor. As for profiling, my i1 Display 2 did a horrible job, possibly because the correction matrix for that colorimeter applied to a vastly different red primary. But once I used the ColorMunki with dispcalGUI/argyll (do *not* use the ColorMunki software; it's a joke), & used the 'adaptive' mode that increases exposure for dark patches, I got a decent profile. -Rishi On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Matthew H. Owens <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I prefer the Eizo Nanao wide gamut displays. I have a cg241. Take a look on > their website. Many seem to accept that Eizo makes an excellent monitor for > working with color. > > Sent from my iPad > On Jun 20, 2011, at 7:25 AM, Marek Matulka <marek.matulka@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi all, > > At the moment I have Dell U2410 wide gamut monitor calibrated with > ColorMunki Photo. > I am being tempted to upgrade it to U2711 - is it worth an effort? > Do you have any experience? > Is it easier to calibrate? :) assuming that I will use argyllcms suite to do > with ColorMunki Photo spectrometer. > > Thanks, > Marek > > -- > http://marek.matulka.net/ >