[argyllcms] Re: DTP94 problem

  • From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:23:48 +1100

Fabrizio Levati wrote:
Is there a way to investigate the problem further?

Not without some inside knowledge of the instrument, or a lot of
messing about.

I'm asking because the instrument is working properly with at least two 
Sorry for the dumb question, could it be that, being re-branded by quato, it is 
someway non-standard?

I wouldn't have thought so. It's returning the error in response to the reset
command, which is one of the most basic commands. I guess it might still operate
if the error is ignored, it just won't give good results if there is no 
drift calibration. So even if other software manages to work, I wouldn't trust
the readings from it.

Graeme Gill.

Other related posts: