[argyllcms] Re: Contributed ccmx files
- From: Claas Bickeböller <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 17:04:15 +0200
Hi all,
maybe our intermediate report about inter-instrument agreement
gives a first idea of what can be expected from "general" ccmx files.
Note that this was a very first test which is extended at the moment in an
actual research project
with more instruments.
The download can be found here.
http://forschung.fogra.org/index.php?menuid=62&reporeid=123&getlang=en
Best regards
Claas
Am 18.09.2010 um 15:39 schrieb Konstantin Pyanzin:
>
> Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:39:28 +1000 письмо от Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> Magnus Berg wrote:
>>> I was very interested yesterday to test the 'Spyder 3 - NEC
>> 2690wuxi2'
>>> correction file. And I did test it. The result was the worst one I had
>>> ever get.
>> Just to be clear, what colorimeter were you using, and what monitor are
>> you using it with ?
>> Graeme Gill.
> ha, it's my files for NEC 2690WUXi2.
> I've written to Graeme Gill that his database is useless. Inter-instument
> agreement makes it awfull.
> BTW My Spyder3 for HP LP2475W matrix is very defferent from database's one.
>
Other related posts:
