[argyllcms] Re: Contributed ccmx files

  • From: Magnus Berg <magnus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:10:10 +0200

I was very interested yesterday to test the 'Spyder 3 - NEC 2690wuxi2'
correction file. And I did test it. The result was the worst one I had
ever get.
I send to test results. The only difference between the two is that I
change white level from 140 to 150 and as I said used the 'Spyder 3 -
NEC 2690wuxi2' correction file. And i did a correction on my monitors
black level to match the correction files new values (I suppose :-) ).
Nothing else!

Magnus Berg


2010-09-16 08:37, Graeme Gill skrev:
>
> A few people have (already!) contributed ccmx files (Colorimeter
> Correction
> Matrix files), and I'm putting them here:
>
> <http://www.argyllcms.com/doc/ccmxs.html>
>
> Graeme Gill.
>
>
>
Title: Profile Verification Report — Screen 1 2010-09-16 150cdm² D6500 min native sRGB HQ XYZLUT+MTX — 2010-09-16 22:21:04

Profile Verification Report

Screen 1 2010-09-16 150cdm² D6500 min native sRGB HQ XYZLUT+MTX — 2010-09-16 22:21:04

 

Evaluation criteria:

Delta E formula for results: CIE 1976 CIE 1994 CIE 2000

Title: Profile Verification | Screen 1 2010-08-25 140cdm² D6500 min native sRGB HQ XYZLUT+MTX | 2010-08-25 15:04:59

Profile Verification

Report

Evaluation criteria:

Delta E formula for overview: CIE 1976 CIE 1994 CIE 2000

Other related posts: