[argyllcms] Re: Confused with PS, softproofing and monitor profile intents

  • From: Claas Bickeböller <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 17:46:36 +0100

De rien

Claas
Am 06.11.2010 um 17:32 schrieb Roger Breton:

> Danke shoën fur der link -- das ist eine shoën document ;-)
> 
> / Roger
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Claas Bickeböller
> Sent: November-06-10 11:23 AM
> To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [argyllcms] Re: Confused with PS, softproofing and monitor profile
> intents
> 
> Hi Vallo,
> 
> in addition to Klaus' answer.
> Maybe the lecture of our Softproofing Handbook gives additional valuable
> input.
> http://forschung.fogra.org/index.php?menuid=62&reporeid=122&getlang=en
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Claas
> 
> P.S. Feedback is welcome
> 
> Am 06.11.2010 um 12:18 schrieb Vallo Kallaste:
> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> Firstly i'm amused by the fact that Xrite profiling software which 
>> comes with Colormunki, creates RGB-TRC (gamma) based profile with 
>> Perceptual intent. As far as I understand it's nonsense, because this 
>> is what cLUT profiles are for. Next I tried to think what happens when 
>> softproofing for printing in Photoshop and got stuck.
>> Can somebody enlighten me what happens behind the scenes in the PS 
>> when one softproofs for specific printer-paper profile?
>> First case would be with matrix monitor profile, with only rel.
>> colorimetric intent.
>> Second case would be with cLUT monitor profile, containing also 
>> perceptual intent. Source images are in ProPhotoRGB space and the cLUT 
>> monitor profile has been made with 'colprof -S ProPhoto.icc ...'. 
>> Printer profile is manufacturer canned one, not that it matters.
>> How are all the profiles and intents interacting? Is PS creating 
>> device link profiles on the fly, considering also source image gamut?
>> 
>> thanks,
>> --
>> Vallo
>> 
> 
> 
> 


Other related posts: