[argyllcms] Re: Complicated question about "Lighting"
- From: <graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 13:02:26 -0400
Graeme,
You wrote :
The only way to tell is to compute delta E's between patches with the same
CMYK under D50 vs. actual illuminant. For a set of profiles created with
D50,
the computed D50 delta E should be zero, while it is likely to be non-zero
computed with the actual illuminant.
It is bound to be greater than zero?
What you suggest seems akin to computing the Metamerism Index (MIvis) for
the press luminaire?
Best / Roger
-----Original Message-----
From: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On
Behalf Of Graeme Gill
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 9:33 PM
To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [argyllcms] Re: Complicated question about "Lighting"
graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
But, I wonder, to what extent the actual viewing illuminant, used at
the press console, throws the appearances off?
The only way to tell is to compute delta E's between patches with the same
CMYK under D50 vs. actual illuminant. For a set of profiles created with
D50, the computed D50 delta E should be zero, while it is likely to be
non-zero computed with the actual illuminant.
Cheers,
Graeme.
Other related posts:
