[argyllcms] Re: Colorimeter recommendations?
- From: Stephen T <stwebvanuatu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 04:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
Yep, most of us have done lots of work with uncalibrated displays.
It's only after you finally have some confidence in what you are doing. For
example, I don't see how you can fine tune white balance for a raw photo if
your display is not neutral.Delta-E < 5 is probably good enough for me.
ST.
________________________________
From: edmund ronald <edmundronald@xxxxxxxxx>
To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, 5 June 2012 10:26 PM
Subject: [argyllcms] Re: Colorimeter recommendations?
Stephen,
Please reconsider the use of the combination of the words "reasonably
accurate" and "not expensive".
I ran macbooks uncalibrated for years and never had any severe printing issues.
If you have real screens and real needs and a desire for future proofing, then
maybe you should just swallow the expense for a colormunki spectro (not the
colorimeter)
Edmund
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Chris Lilley <chris@xxxxxx> wrote:
On Monday, June 4, 2012, 2:26:26 AM, Graeme wrote:
>
>
>GG> Stephen T wrote:
>>> I don't have a spectrophotometer to build calibration matrices. I want
>>> something that's
>>> reasonably accurate out-of-the-box and not expensive!
>
>GG> i1 display pro or ColorM
Other related posts:
