[argyllcms] Re: Colorimeter recommendations?
- From: Chris Lilley <chris@xxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 14:10:30 +0200
On Monday, June 4, 2012, 2:26:26 AM, Graeme wrote:
GG> Stephen T wrote:
>> I don't have a spectrophotometer to build calibration matrices. I want
>> something that's
>> reasonably accurate out-of-the-box and not expensive!
GG> i1 display pro or ColorMunki Display are currently head and shoulders
GG> above any other device in the consumer price bracket, and appears to be
equal
GG> with the DISCUS in accuracy. The i1pro display is fast too. I had some
reservations
GG> about its ability to handle refresh type displays, but I'm now quite pleased
GG> with its capabilities when used in refresh mode with my latest Argyll
drivers.
GG> It would be my choice right at the moment, with the Spyder4 the next choice.
Agreed on allpoints.
At this point I would not recommend a Colorhug as a sole device. At this point
it really needs a spectro alongside, to calibrate it. This may well change in
the future.
I have both an i1 display pro and a ColorMunki Photo. For calibration of LCD
screens, both wide gamut and normal gamut, the i1D3 is somewhat preferable to
the ColorMunki which has some problems with the darkest colours.
--
Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain
W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Other related posts:
