[argyllcms] Re: Camera matrix profile, adding ti3 perfect white data set

  • From: Ben Goren <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:32:08 -0700

On 2010 Jan 22, at 9:23 AM, Klaus Karcher wrote:

> Elle Stone wrote:
>> An issue with camera matrix profiles made with v1.0.4 was that the
>> brightest patch got scaled to L=100, for reasons that make sense for a
>> printer profile but not so much for a camera profile.
> 
> you are right IMHO -- it doesn't make much sense for me either. But it is the 
> "expected" behavior for an ICC compliant input (i.e scanner or camera) 
> profile.

Isn't that the point of colprof's -u flag...? Or am I missing something...?

b&

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. argyllcms
  3. Archive
  4. 01-2010