[argyllcms] Re: Camera calibration: LUT only as good as matrix?

  • From: Gerhard Fuernkranz <nospam456@xxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 08:13:47 +0200

Am 04.07.2013 01:46, schrieb Graeme Gill:
Gerhard Fuernkranz wrote:

Btw, I'm not sure if anybody has already noticed this yet, however, on a 
reflective IT8
target one can indeed find a subset of about 100 patches, which are almost (< 1 
delta E
deviation) "additive" (i.e. the reflectance spectra of these patches are 
(almost) linear
combinations of three basis spectra).
Hi Gerhard,
        isn't that a consequence of those patches being (effectively) composed 
of
just three colorants ? - ie. that their spectra are a linear combination of
three colorant spectra ?

Hi Graeme,

I would not expect that. There are certainly just three colorants involved, but 
the mixing-model of the chemical printing process is not additive, but rather 
multiplicative (no half-tone raster involved, i.e. Neugebauer does not apply - 
rather Beer's law applies, but not exactly either). Maybe a non-linear PCA were 
able to represent the spectra of all patches with just three principal 
components, but it is is by far not possible to represent the _whole_ set of 
patches by _linear_ combinations of only three basis spectra with reasonable 
accuracy. Despite the non-linearity of the mixing process it is however still 
possible to find a 3-dimensional subspace of spectral space, in which as many 
as about 100 of the patches happen to lie...

Best Regards,
Gerhard


Other related posts: