[argyllcms] Re: Camera Profiling using ArgyllCMS
- From: "Pascal de Bruijn" <pmjdebruijn@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 18:15:58 +0100
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Pascal de Bruijn <pmjdebruijn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Bob Coss <bobcoss@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Pascal,
>>
>> Do you have a final conclusion about what approach is working best for
>> producing a camera profile using Argyll?
>>
>> Can you share which parameters you decided upon?
>
> I've updated my article here:
> http://blog.pcode.nl/
>
> But this is the command-line that has been working the best for me:
>
> # scanin -v -p -dip canon.tif it8.cht R080505.txt
> # colprof -v -A "Canon" -M "EOS 400D" -D "Canon EOS 400D (daylight)"
> -C "Copyright (c) 2008 Pascal de Bruijn. Some rights reserved." -r 1
> -q u -a S -n c canon
>
> I have tried -a G as well, but a shaper seems to give better results.
> Also there only a small difference between -a S and -a s, though a
> single shaper looks slightly better to me.
Sorry, I put in the wrong link...
This is my procedure to make (more or less generic) camera profiles:
http://blog.pcode.nl/2008/11/color-profiling-your-own-dslr-redux
This is the actual profile which I use on 90% of my photos:
http://blog.pcode.nl/2008/11/canon-eos-400d-color-profile-redux-redux
Regards,
Pascal de Bruijn
Other related posts:
