[argyllcms] Re: Camera Profiling using ArgyllCMS

  • From: Kai-Uwe Behrmann <ku.b@xxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:47:11 +0100 (CET)

Am 27.11.08, 20:13 +0100 schrieb Pascal de Bruijn:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 3:08 AM, Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

There are many differences between the three profiles. The profile maker
profile has XYZ PCS, and includes both matrix and CLUT tables. Given this,
it's probably hard to know which of these a CMM or application
is actually using.

I thought I noticed that as well. But aren't there any conventions
about this? My
guess is most software is written towards use with Adobe's CMM...

I think there is a priority to use first multi dimensional LUT's and then matrices and per channel shapers. Here ...
"ICC.1:2004-10 (v4.2) 8.10 Priority of tag usage"

kind regards
Kai-Uwe Behrmann
developing for colour management www.behrmann.name + www.oyranos.org

Other related posts: