Alan Goldhammer wrote:
paper that has OBAs that I've seen. Unfortunately, this leads to a blue cast with the profile when viewed in Photoshop.
Hi,
My understanding is that since CM is a UV-cut instrument the normal Argyll -f switch does not work (though my assumption may be wrong).
Argyll's FWA compensation is based on measurement, so yes, it's only of use with a UV capable instrument - ie. not the ColorMunki.
A standard test print with the CM Argyll generated profile turned out fine in every respect and in some cases was superior to the CM profile that I had been using (and far superior to the profile Ilford has on their website for the Epson 3880.
If the profile does the right thing in representing the device behaviour, evidenced by a suitable looking print, it's not clear to me why you say there is a problem. Can you explain in a bit more detail ? Graeme Gill.