On Jul 16, 2014, at 1:17 PM, Andreas F.X. Siegert <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Why should I support something that I consider obviously wrong and have > empirical evidence to support my position? It's a question of workflow. Just as the Sports Illustrated crowd would generally be insane to shoot RAW, for most photographers BetaRGB represents a better workflow for what they actually do. The great thing about picking a standard working space for a RAW workflow is that you can optimize your workflow for what you mostly do, and then alter it as needed for the occasional exceptions. For most people, that means that BetaRGB is going to be better for them most of the time, but you can still switch to ProPhoto or whatever when you really do need it. Premature optimization is the root of all evil. b&
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
