Thanks Fabrizio, based upon your experience, which one is better for wide gamut displays? Is it a table or matrix profile? I'd really prefer to get it via a LUT, but the Lab LUT is often out of gamut, as told by Argyll during profile creation. Regards, Paolo On 07/gen/2012, at 11:59, Fabrizio Giudici wrote: > On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 08:37:42 +0100, Paolo Avezzano <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> I bought a wide gamut display and a very good colorimeter to build a LUT >> profile, if possible. >> I do not find the -ax setting (XYZ LUT + swapped matrix) to be quite robust. >> Almost every single Argyll CMS tutorial I read advised to do so. >> With my MacBook Pro display it did a nice work, but now the Dell gamut is >> only slightly bigger than my laptop one, and that of course cannot be true. >> >> Do you have any other suggestions? > > My approach is to generate four kinds of profiles, and then pick the one with > the least error. > > $ARGYLL_BIN/colprof -v -qu -ni -no -ag -O "$BASE_NAME gm.icc" "$BASE_NAME" > $ARGYLL_BIN/colprof -v -qu -ni -no -as -O "$BASE_NAME sm.icc" "$BASE_NAME" > $ARGYLL_BIN/colprof -v -qu -ni -no -al -O "$BASE_NAME cLUTlab.icc" > "$BASE_NAME" > $ARGYLL_BIN/colprof -v -qu -ni -no -ax -O "$BASE_NAME cLUTxyz.icc" > "$BASE_NAME" > > Actually -ax works for the MacBook Pro LCD, but I have a problem too with the > external monitor (see my other post). The latests news is that I seem to have > fixed it even with the -ax, but I'll give details later when I'm sure. > > > > -- > Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager > Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." > fabrizio.giudici@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://tidalwave.it - http://fabriziogiudici.it >