Hi, Am 08.01.2012 21:18, schrieb Fabrizio Giudici:
*Lots* of applications do not like monitor LUT profiles, here one example http://photo.net/digital-darkroom-forum/00YAguThanks. But this doesn't have to do with an "experimental" nature of the LUT feature in Argyll, rather with the alleged incapability of some software to handle them - at least as far as I understand. Right?
Correct. It's unfortunate that some applications do not support LUT profiles, and some only use the matrix part of Argyll's XYZ LUT profiles (thus the XYZ LUT + swapped matrix option, if you get swapped colors with it, the respective application uses the deliberately color swapped matrix instead of the LUT. The XYZ LUT + swapped matrix option is purely meant as a way to alert you in case the application does not use the LUT).
Generically speaking, I wouldn't exclude the use of LUT in principle, since matrix profiles in my case are off the 2 dE threshold. I'd rather carefully test throughout the whole workflow and eventyally give up if a problem arises. What do you think
Agreed. -- Florian Höch
