[argyllcms] Re: Autotools again...
- From: "Alastair M. Robinson" <blackfive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 14:26:03 +0100
Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
An additional point is the name conflict with littleCMS about icclink. Can
you make the installation of icclink optional untill the issue might be
solved otherwise (like renaming)?
Since argyll's equivalent of tifficc if cctiff, perhaps cclink would be
a suitable replacement name?
Ah - I hadn't considered that clash. I'll see what I can do.
would you consider taking these changes into your package and allow an
double build system? It would help accepting your package for
distributors on Linux.
There are no changes at all to the actual source code in this package,
so that would be do-able.
If Graeme doesn't want to pollute his own tree with autotools files,
then just including the tarball alongside the other download options
would be sufficient...
I have a slight ulterior motive in this: in the next development cycle
of the Gutenprint project we're going to want to do some work regarding
colour management. What shape that will take we don't yet know, but
it'll be a lot easier if Argyll is packaged and available for our target
platforms in the meantime! :)
All the best,
Alastair M. Robinson
Other related posts: