[argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS V1.3.6 Released
- From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:05:11 +1100
János, Tóth F. wrote:
> But the refresh measurements of a different PDP were slightly
> different from what I expected. I can't post the log now (it was
> included in the lost email but I am not at home now) but as I remember
> it was ~30ms in 60Hz mode where I would expect ~17 or ~33.
It's hard to say. You would really need some independent means
of verifying the actual refresh period. If you try the calibration
several times, do you get consistent values ?
You could recompile with #define PLOT_REFRESH in i1d3.c
and see what the plots show.
Graeme Gill.
Other related posts:
