-------- Original-Nachricht -------- Datum: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:51:51 +1000 Von: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> An: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Betreff: [argyllcms] Re: Argyll bundled with professional proofing solution > This does not address a package though. A package is a work in itself, > and if the package is composed of different programs, one of which > depends on another in the package for some of it's features > (irrespective of how they communicate), then the features of the package > are certainly derived from that program, and hence the package > is a derived work. See section 0 of the GNU licence. Graeme, but what about this paragraph in the GPL FAQ? >> I'd like to incorporate GPL-covered software in my >> proprietary system. Can I do this? >> >> [...] >> >> However, in many cases you can distribute the >> GPL-covered software alongside your proprietary system. >> To do this validly, you must make sure that the free >> and non-free programs communicate at arms length, that >> they are not combined in a way that would make them >> effectively a single program. This rather suggets that it is sufficient to separate the GPL and non-GPL "programs", such the the non-GPL programs don't contain GPL code. And the definition >> You may modify your copy or copies of the Program >> or any portion of it, thus forming a work based >> on the Program [...] in the license itself IMO also suggest, that a "work based on the program" does not refer to another program which makes use of functionality provided by the GPL-ed program, but rathers refers to modifications/extensions of a GPL-ed program. Regards, Gerhard -- Gerhard Fuernkranz nospam456@xxxxxx NEU: GMX DSL Sofort-Start-Set â blitzschnell ins Internet! Echte DSL-Flatrate ab 0,- Euro* http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl