[argyllcms] Re: Argyll 1.7 dev on OpenBSD
- From: Pascal de Bruijn <pmjdebruijn@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 20:18:05 +0100
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Pascal de Bruijn wrote:
>
> >> Sorry, I got as far as I did, and then stopped developing it.
> >> BSD is not listed in the doco. as a known operating environment :-)
>
> > Right fair enough.
>
> I'll add a #pragma message to the usbio_bsd.c file, so at least there
> is a message when you compile it.
>
Great.
> > It does, however, the argyll build system thinks my 64bit openbsd system
> is
> > 32bit, so it's the second libX11.so reference that needs libX11.a added,
> if
> > that approach is to be taken.
>
> That means the 64 bit detection should be fixed.
>
> Is HOSTTYPE exported in your environment ?
>
Nope.
Presumably this is why the OpenBSD port maintainer special cased it. As far
as I can tell there is no difference between 32bit and 64bit systems on
OpenBSD, so the paths are always the same.
Regards,
Pascal de Bruijn
Other related posts:
