[argyllcms] AW: Re: {Spam?} Re: Number of patches vs. profile quality
- From: "Jens Heermann" <heermann@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 09:06:02 +0200
Hello Nikolay,
maybe I missed it in one of the mails before, but which measurement device
do you use? X-Rite i1 pro?
Regards
Jens
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Im Auftrag von Graeme Gill
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2011 06:06
An: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [argyllcms] Re: {Spam?} Re: Number of patches vs. profile quality
Nikolay Pokhilchenko wrote:
> It's interesting question. From my experience, there is not enough 1400
patches for
> profiling "unknown" RGB printer (Canon or Epson with non-original inks).
The most
> problems are in the darks: the printer and paper combination may have an
unpredictable
> behavior (steepness of device response in dark region) and the 1440
patches of OFPS is
> insufficient. With 1440 patches, darks are not well characterized in 50%
of cases.
> There may be few patches per volume unit of the darks.
Hi Nikolay,
where in the dark gamut do you think this problem lies ?
Towards neutral, or towards the edge of the gamut ?
Graeme Gill.
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] AW: Re: {Spam?} Re: Number of patches vs. profile quality - Jens Heermann
