[argyllcms] Re: A beginner's questions
- From: "Luud Heck" <luud.heck@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:32:01 +0100
On Jan 30, 2008 9:38 PM, Leonard Evens <len@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> You shouldn't be using xgamma. You want to load the vgct tag in your
> monitor profile using either dispwin or xcalib. If you look at the
> argyll archives you will find an explanation of the difference between
> xgamma and the others. You will also find a discussion I initiated
> about what the point of loading the vgct tag is and what else a color
> managed application like gimp 2.4 does with the profile. I was rather
> confused about the matter, and a couple of kindly souls set me straight.
I think this should be that thread:
//www.freelists.org/archives/argyllcms/01-2008/msg00281.html
>
> > As my
> > monitor is connected via DVI digital I only have backlight control on
> > the monitor. I adjusted the gamma until dispcal would tell me that it
> > measures a gamma of about 2.2 (using "dispcal -yl -r"). After this I
> > ran the profiling step (option 6 when running "dispcal -v2 -yl -o
> > Samsung191T").
>
> I have a Samsung 226CW. You should read very carefully what the argyll
> documentation says about profiling LCD monitors. Lars has addressed
> this issue in his answer and you would do well to take his advice.
Well, the only thing I can change is the backlight. All other options are
locked as I use a DVI digital connection between computer and monitor.
(Contrast shows 50% and does not allow change.)
The funny thing with xgamma is that it does not affect my display, whereas
fglrx_xgamma, the tool from ATI, does affect the display.
I don't understand the relation between xgamma and video card lut yet.
I have to do some more reading and searching about this first.
Thanks for the feedback and pointers!
Regards,
Luud
Other related posts:
