[apt4ssx8] Re: Some clarification on the code

  • From: "Kent A. Reed" <kentallanreed@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: apt4ssx8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:22:54 -0500

On 1/31/2013 12:04 AM, Matt Shaver wrote:
I_think_  that this computer code is either in the public domain, or in
that weird state of being "a Work of the United States Government", or
quite possibly there is no one left who cares what happens.

Gentle persons:

I'm really sorry I'm being a "helicopter" participant hopping in and out but my attention is focused on my wife's declining well-being. I'll chip in as I find a free moment.

On this point, we appear stuck in a cleft stick.

The CAM-I was an international organization of companies who paid serious (to me if not to not them!)) project-specific dues to participate in each of the various technical work areas. Projects included "geometric modeling", "sculptured surfaces", and "advanced N/C". In one chart which I saw, the project-funding breakdown was approximately 70 percent North America, 26 percent Europe and 4 percent Japan. As evidence of the international nature of the work, I note the Sculptured Surfaces Part Programmers Manual (http://www.catapt.com/APTssman/apt2_www.htm), developed at Cranfield Institute of Technology, that I mention on my Google Site (https://sites.google.com/site/manisbutareed/apt-re).

I haven't updated my miniscule description of CAM-I on my Google Site mostly because my visit to NIST last summer didn't turn up any useful CAM-I-produced APT material. The Manufacturing Engineering Laboratory at NIST did participate in CAM-I but that was sooo last century.

I say we're stuck in a cleft stick because CAM-I project deliverables were first embargoed to the actual project participants (at one point in time, some 34 members worked on geometric modeling and 14 members on sculptured surfaces, where member might be an individual or a multinational corporation). Then, after some reasonable time period, project deliverables became available to all CAM-I members. This timed-release mechanism was intended to encourage paid membership in individual projects and not just in CAM-I itself. Later on, I believe outsiders could apply to CAM-I to purchase a deliverable such as the APT/SSX software on a magnetic tape.

Whatever work NASA contributed to CAM-I may indeed by "a work of the United States Government not subject to copyright" but it has to say so. In any case, such a statement would cover just NASA's contribution. If it were work performed under the terms of a CAM-I membership or a CRADA in force between NASA and CAM-I then its copyright is governed by the prevailing agreement.

The "M" in CAM-I has long since been changed from Manufacturing to Management. I have no clue how the new CAM-I regards the products of its predecessor organization.

I wish people had been more attentive to issues of software copyright, software fair-use, and such 30 years ago but it was a different time when the fledgling Internet had not yet become an information highway and personal computing was just a gleam in the eye of some of us (when CAM-I was formed I was working with my own homebrew 6502-based computer, not unlike but less capable than Steve Wozniak's Apple I---some people are more clever than others!).

I think it prudent to keep our work to ourselves for the time being.

I'm not a lawyer nor do I play one on TV so consider these the idle musings of an old man.

Regards,
Kent

PS - "not subject to copyright" is equivalent to "public domain". However, in recent decades, the notion that every work of a USA government employee is not subject to copyright appears no longer to be absolute. We have such things as Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADA), which may impose restrictions.

PPS - I would like to keep my hand in but any contributions will be on an as-time-permits basis. I may add snippets to my Google Site but my level of effort will be much less than it was last summer. Feel free to copy over any useful items that may already be on it. As always, acknowledgment of the source is appreciated.

Other related posts: