> > It's a profoundly stupid one. > > You're in a particularly acerbic mood today, Chris... Nothing new, eh? My apologies for the tone. Dennis is a better diplomat than I. (So are you. I'd have put that differently...) > In retrospect, I suppose it comes down to it being simply that APAWorks > holds itself to more professional standards, so the question should have > been moot. It's not a professional standard. It's right versus wrong on a moral and legal level. > So would it then be kosher to say "To see the original illustration this > writeup/design/conversion/etc is inspired by, go to <link>"? There is some (fairly stupid) debate on that subject. I say, yeah, it's perfectly fine. Some folks seem to think otherwise, surprisingly. Chris