Hello Vicky,
Follow-up below...
On 4/30/2016 4:39 AM, Victoria Mercieca wrote:
I'm sorry, I'm lost on this discussion. I thought we'd addressed it by noting what interface a message was received on, and making sure to send a response on the same interface.
If this doesn't fix the problem, definitely get the discussion on MANET and if its not too much trouble, state exactly what problem it solves, I apologise but I feel like I don't have time to scroll back through the archives. I think we have until Wednesday?
Kind regards,
Vicky.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:charles.perkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hello folks,
I could submit a design for using RFC 7182 for the end-to-end
authentication unless you folks already have a plan for that.
I would also be willing to carry on the discussion about
multi-interface IP address (MIA) handling unless something has
been decided about that. I didn't see any follow-up to my
previous discussion here or on the mailing list, so I don't know
the status.
Please let me know...
Regarding the MIA support, I think we ought to have a
configuration variable called MIA_SUPPORT. If TRUE, then the
platform would have to meet certain requirements. These can be
formulated as requirements for "interface ID" support, or support
for MAC addresses. In the former case, I expect the requirement
for support would be more invasive. Supporting MAC addresses is
much more natural for the operating system platform.
Regards,
Charlie P.