All,
I’m opposed to releasing a version 12 without making a run at addressing all of
Clausen’s comments. He (Clausen) has been one of the “squeakiest wheels” with
the charge that “the AODVv2 editorial team isn’t listening, and isn’t
incorporating review comments”. IMO, putting a version 12 out without
addressing his review allows (actually, it encourages) that ‘food-fight’ to
start back up again.
Just my 2-cents-worth.
Regards,
Stan
From: aodvv2-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:aodvv2-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Victoria Mercieca
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 4:58 AM
To: aodvv2-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aodvv2-discuss] Re: Status, please?
Hi all,
To add to this, I think I addressed most of Chris' comments, though not all are
resolved, and tried to address a few of Thomas Clausen's also. Should we
release a version 12 at this point with so many comments outstanding? If we
take on board Thomas Clausen's comments I think we will have a large update.
Plus, as many of us have been busy/away, is it better to have the input of all
members of the author team before sending out new updates? If necessary I can
do some proofreading, update the "changes since..." and get a version ready
today.
Kind regards,
Victoria.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:41 AM, John Dowdell
<john.dowdell486@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:john.dowdell486@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hi Charlie
I'm just back in the office yesterday after most of two weeks off, so I'm also
wading through the day job backlog.
I haven't seen either Chris' or Thomas' comments but it sounds like you are a
long way towards generating answers. It's going to be a few days before I can
put the time in to have a proper look through. Like you, I'm disappointed that
it's taken this long to extract comments from the WG but I guess we all have
busy day jobs. However we have the comments now.
Stan, it might be worth penning a note to Justin (or even to the manet list)
that we've had some last-minute substantial comments following the WG meeting
and therefore we are unable to make our deadline that we were asked to commit
to in Prague. Without seeing the comments it's difficult to decide what the new
deadline should be but I can see it's going to be at least two more weeks and
maybe three before a new version is out.
My problem is that my funding for Vicky to spend time editing the draft is at
an end and I'll have to go and ask people if there is some underspend I can
help them with.
Regards
John
On 10/08/15 17:59, Charlie Perkins wrote:
Hello folks,
We're supposed to have had a new revision by last week.
Could someone please let me know the status, and if we are going to be judged
as having met our goal?
Also, I developed quite many hours worth of responses to recent comments to the
mailing list, and posted those responses here. I hope that my responses will
be considered as worthwhile to incorporate into the upcoming revision. Should
we have a teleconference to discuss the details? Admittedly, some of those
details were done hurriedly, as I was under the strong impression that we had
to put out a new revision last week.
I suppose that, according to discussions at the last IETF, we will not be
judged poorly if we do not resolve every comment that was posted at the very
very last minute -- and so I hope we can produce the revision, meet the goal,
and continue to Last Call as soon as possible.
Regards,
Charlie P.
_____________________________________________________
This electronic message and any files transmitted with it contains
information from iDirect, which may be privileged, proprietary
and/or confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the original
recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email
in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or
copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email
in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.
_____________________________________________________
