I'll reply on list to answer this.
Justin
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Lotte Steenbrink <
lotte.steenbrink@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Charlie,
Am 17.03.2016 um 10:55 schrieb Charlie Perkins <
charles.perkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hello Lotte,
Which major issue has not been tackled? Is it about the MIAs versus MAC
address? I have some follow-up to Rick Taylor about that.
My bad– I thought we hadn’t resolved
*(There wasn’t any text above and it’s not clear how this is enforced. I
have an idle route and an unconfirmed route, the unconfirmed route is
updated to confirmed, I now have two valid route entries and no way to
demote/decide or otherwise purge one of them but I’m not allowed to do
that. Setting the worse and previously idle route to unconfirmed seems
wrong and broken. JWD!)*
, but we actually have– the only one that’s missing now is
(AODVv2_INTERFACES isn’t defined before now it should be. Also what does
this configuration consist of? Also is the list empty if there is only one
interface? JWD!)
according to my summary of our last call, you volunteered to craft some
text for that, does the offer still stand? ;)
I think we have to get the draft out with all issues resolved ASAP,
certainly by Internet Draft deadline.
exactly, which is why I’m trying to move things forward (, with responses
to our proposed fixes on [manet] being.. sparse, unfortunately). But as I
said, if those efforts are futile anyway, I’d like to know before I
prioritize this over other tasks.
I could revise the E2E draft to use 7182 if that would help.
Regards,
Charlie P.
On 3/17/2016 2:50 AM, Lotte Steenbrink wrote:
Hi folks,
I’m not quite sure how to start this E-Mail. If I remember Justin’s
ultimatum correctly, he said he’d review the document and give us the
verdict whether AODVv2 will be killed or not. We got the review (which is
awesome), made a lot of changes based on it, asked questions and proposed
improvements– but we still don’t know if AODVv2 has a future at all.
Frankly, I’d find it extremely frustrating if AODVv2 was killed without a
trace after all the hard work (and time) we’ve poured into it, but if
that’s the case, I’d rather find out sooner than later– I’d find it equally
frustrating to realize that we’ve been working on a document that has
already been pronounced dead.
Does anybody know what the status is here? Or did I misunderstand Justin?
And In case it isn’t dead, what do you think of arranging another
conference call? There are some TODOs in the Security Considerations that
need to be tackled and one of Justin’s major issues isn’t resolved yet.
Best regards,
Lotte
