[aodvv2-discuss] Re: Routes to Neighbors / Unconfirmed Routes

  • From: Lotte Steenbrink <lotte.steenbrink@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: aodvv2-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 22:20:20 +0200

Hi Vicky,

Am 23.06.2015 um 20:22 schrieb Ratliff, Stanley <sratliff@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

Vicky,

You’re holding the editorial pen – I’d say “Go for it.”

Agreed, just one question out of curiosity– Would the RREP_Ack in Justin's
scenario (“B sends RREP with A tagged with RREP_Ack request and C tagged with
RREP_Ack”) be embedded into the multicast RREP message or would both messages
have to be added to the same packet?
(I couldn't find a passage in RFC5444 that allows a protocol to mandate this
with a quick search, but tf.org/html/rfc7181#section-13.2 seems to enforce it,
so it should work?)

Regards,
Lotte


Regards,
Stan


What does everyone else think? I want to get this updated sooooon!


_____________________________________________________
This electronic message and any files transmitted with it contains
information from iDirect, which may be privileged, proprietary
and/or confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the original
recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email
in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or
copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email
in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.
_____________________________________________________

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. aodvv2-discuss
  3. Archive
  4. 06-2015