Don;t know if this got sent - I hit "delete" instead of "send" (not enough
coffee this morning)...
Resending with apologies for multiple copies.
Stan
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: [aodvv2-discuss] Re: AODVv2
To: "aodvv2-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <aodvv2-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Here's a shot at it:
The purpose of the experiment with AODVv2 is to gain information on the
behavior of the protocol in real-world deployments, furthering the
knowledge base of both reactive protocols in general, and with AODVv2 in
particular. Another goal of the experiment is to determine if sufficient
demand exists for the AODVv2 protocol to prompt an effort to bring the
protocol to Standards Track.
???
Regards,
Stan
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Lotte Steenbrink <
lotte.steenbrink@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Stan,
In case you’re reading this in time, could you turn the outline you’ve
written into a nice paragraph?
Best,
Lotte
Am 19.04.2016 um 23:23 schrieb Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@xxxxxxxxx>:
Team,
FYI. The experiment is to get the protocol into deployments, increasing
the knowledge of reactive protocols in general, and to see if there is
sufficient demand to ultimately make the protocol a standard. Justin,
please correct if this is in error.
Regards,
Stan
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
*From:* Justin Dean <bebemaster@xxxxxxxxx>
*Date:* April 19, 2016 at 5:05:25 PM EDT
*To:* Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@xxxxxxxxx>
*Subject:* *Re: AODVv2*
Experimental. Please add some text regarding the experiment to the draft.
Justin
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016, 4:58 PM Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Justin,
The team has coalesced around the notion of having an updated draft by
1200 Eastern tomorrow. The call on Experimental vs. Standards Track is
yours. But this will be ready for the 2-week WGLC.
Regards,
Stan
