[antispam-f] Re: What have they got against Deborah anyway?
- From: Dave Barnett <as10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 20:39:11 GMT
In a recent message Harriet Bazley
<lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 18 Nov 2006 as I do recall,
> Harriet Bazley wrote:
>
>>
>> "I've found that a lot of the "debora" spam, as well as a fair amount
>> of other spam, matches /6c822ecf/ in one or more of Message-ID and
>> Content-ID headers. I have yet to see a false positive."
>>
>> According to my logs this seems to be true; picks up all the deboras and
>> a few other things along the way.
>>
> The deboras seem to have stopped, but I'm still getting a *lot* of
>
> Delete Message-Id: = *6c822ecf*
>
There does seem to have been a general qualitative change in the spam,
not quantitative though ;-(
Makes it difficult to keep rules current.
--
Dave
Keep GMT all year
Other related posts:
