[antispam-f] Re: What have they got against Deborah anyway?
- From: Tricia Garner <tricia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:07:03 +0000 (GMT)
On 25 Nov, in article <88fa5e8b4e.Dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Dave Barnett <as10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In a recent message Tricia Garner
> <tricia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 25 Nov, in article <0c20498b4e.Dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > Dave Barnett <as10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> In a recent message Tricia Garner
> >> <tricia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> [...]
> >> > I have just started to investigate marking, which seems to be
> >> > successful except I find it confusing that mail already marked and
> >> > dealt with is still mentioned in the marking window several days
> >> > later. Is there some setting I have missed which makes the marking
> >> > window only refer to the current session?
> >> >
> >> Have you pressed the 'Process' button?
> >
> > Yes, but it only seems to work sometimes.
> >
> I found that this happening if I had not marked a message for some
> action or changed the action, although there were some times when I
> couldn't explain it. Usually I had to wait until the Message-ID had
> expired (see Scan window in Choices), you can change the number of
> days to speed things up.
Thanks, I think that could be it. I've changed the number of days to 2 from
5 so hopefully that should do the trick.
--
Tricia
Age is a very high price to pay for maturity.
Other related posts:
