[antispam-f] Re: What have they got against Deborah anyway?
- From: Fred Bambrough <fred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:27:49 GMT
In message <4e8b06e796Jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Jeremy C B Nicoll <Jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In article <5863ff8a4e.Dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Dave Barnett <as10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
[snip]
>> I confess that I have only a couple of To: deletes (and I could lose
>> those), but a Defer To: may sometimes tell you if it worth looking
>> further. Combining it with another rule that is not good enough on
>> its own can work.
>
> What specific "To:" values have you found useful?
Delete To: = *fredd*
Delete To: -
Delete To: = " " <>
Delete To: = *.fred@ypical*
--
Fred
Other related posts:
