[antispam-f] Re: Useful rule?

  • From: Jeremy C B Nicoll <Jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 04:15:35 +0100

In article <ef64f1794e.fred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
   Fred Bambrough <fred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm finding the following rule useful for catching a lot of the
> recent spam increase. I haven't had any false hits so far but as
> always you'll probably want to use 'Defer' initially in case your
> legitimate mail differs from mine.

> Delete Content-Type: = *multipart/alternative*
> And Content-Type: <> *text/plain*

Since both those conditions would be satisfied by the first
content-type header in any mail that happens to be
*multipart/alternative* how can that be safe?

-- 
Jeremy C B Nicoll, Edinburgh, Scotland - my opinions are my own.

Other related posts: