In a recent message Steven Pampling <steve.pampling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 21 Dec, Dave Barnett <as10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> In a recent message Steven Pampling > > [Snip] > >> You might also point out that HTML, if used in this way, is frequently >> a signature of spam or malware. > > I think you missed the significance of the phraseology. It looks like one > of the standard messages that appear on the net when you hit a site that > your browser can't deal with properly (due to their bad code usually) or > the kind of message that appears in your mail when the dipstick mail client > is trying to push you into using html mail. > > I just turn the thing around and make the implication that *their* mail > client is at fault for not being set right or not supporting the correct > mail setup. Which of course is correct. > Agreed. Slashdot recently had a link to www.fcw.com/article97178-12-22-06-Web which endorses my point. -- Dave Keep GMT all year