[antispam-f] Re: Rule with And action
- From: Dave Barnett <as10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 09:57:55 GMT
In a recent message Jeremy C B Nicoll
<Jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In article <a63e75804e.Dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Dave Barnett <as10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I think all the examples I've seen have 'Subject' starting "Re: " so
>> that may form the 4th test in the sequence.
>
> Which makes it a reply to an original. It's hardly a unique criterion
> is it?
>
There is no original. Perhaps a test to detect the absence of
'References:' could be added. That approach would have a wider
application. Will RTFM again.
If Muppets are using unpatched software, they probably deserve to be
(personally) deleted;-)
--
Dave
Keep GMT all year
Other related posts:
