[antispam-f] Re: Rule hitting 50% of spam
- From: Steven Pampling <steve.pampling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 07:43:11 +0000 (GMT)
On 07 Nov, Harriet Bazley <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Here's an example of a perfectly genuine reply I received last month
> (arrived at the ISP without Message-ID *or* References headers....)
> Presumably Microsoft's 'Thread-Index' header is supposed to be a
> substitute?
Why use an ordinary wheel when you can re-invent it?
--
Steve Pampling
Other related posts:
